We dont want freedom.
We want our own way.
Freedom is the compromise.

Recycled shit and will

There is a spectrum of materialism vs idealism.
The extreme materialist is a money grubber, a power grubber, a man with little or no purpose or goal. He approaches life like an accountant, knowing the price of things but not the value.
The extreme idealist views life purely in abstract or conceptual terms and typically sneers at the more earthy parts. They hold the meat parts of life at arms length with disgust. Meat is something less.
Both are anti-life, both are broken and reject parts of reality. Both are incomplete.
To see only meat is to miss the point but to see only ideals is to miss reality.
Meat, piss, shit and blood are inseparable from love, duty, truth, will. They exist in the same world and are part of the same Natural Law/existence/reality/truth. Our body isn't just a inconvenient meat suit that our soul wears until we are dead. Neither is it just a meat automaton.
Until we see our meat as something wholesome instead of something to be held at arms length or endured we are as bad as the worst sort of materialist.
You know who isn't ok with his meat? Bruce Jenner. The fucking lunatic is at odds with his biological truth, his meat. We can easily recognise him as insane because of this and yet i see a lot of people sneering at meat and the parts of existence that are made of it. Like its less important or inconvenient. If your world view cant handle getting dirt on it, if it cant tolerate being made out of meat, is somehow reduced by it or is in opposition to it then you are delusional and wrong because you struggle against reality in a similar way to the most deranged tranny.
The materialism/idealism of a man: Universal Logos, his peoples Logos, his own logos. Whole.
The distinction between meat and concepts is irrelevant.
Meat and soul together.
Recycled shit and will.
They're made out of meat

Dont Die Easy

Q: What animates life?
A: Will.

   Will to procreate and raise offspring.
   Will to hunt, gather, farm.
   Will to fight and struggle, overcome, strive.
   All the process of life arise from will.
   All life is the embodiment of will in the end. Differing wills yes, often in competition. But will is what animates it all. Our genes are moulded by will for ultimately what powers evolution but the contending wills of living creatures to fight, procreate and survive?
   Simple, instinctual, honest will untroubled by conscience or regret.
   Our cultures, ethnicity, nations are all dependent on and are manifestations of will or its lack and the will of the competition.
   We are literally will made manifest, physically and mentally, personally and nationally and the condition we allow ourselves to persist in as a result of our own choices is a direct reflection of our inner nature and the state of that will.
   Where will is lacking life grows stale and withers.
   Consider our lives. How different would they be if we had but the will?
We have more 'stuff' and 'things' than any sane man could ever want and not only does it leave us hollow, we do nothing with it and we still want more. We have withered. We have made ourselves domesticated animals. Like cows our highest goal is to find the best patch of juicy grass and be left alone to chew.

Q: What is the difference between a domesticated animal and a wild one 

A: Struggle.

   Compare the two, domestic and wild and understand what makes one so blunt and the other so sharp and why i don't need to tell you which is which. Where does the vigour, the LIFE! that we sense in wild creatures come from and why do so few of us have it?
   Its simple, honest suffering and ordeal as a part of the struggle of life that demands solutions and stimulates the will.
   Fear, pain and desperate struggle put the fire in the eyes of life. Its our painful birth right.
   A man worthy of life is never more alive, focused and full of will as when he thinks he is about to die.
   Isn't this the best joke of the universe?
   Instead of cursing our predicament curse the timid cows we have become that brought us to this.
   Lets play along instead of just looking for a better field to graze in.
   Lets grasp the firebrand of LIFE! while we can, without flinching and hit something with it!
   Lets join the struggle instead of running from it.
   Lets take up our will as a weapon against all softness and complaint.
   Lets sink our teeth into life and hear it squeal while we still have life in us.
   If suffering and struggle are the price we pay for living lets make it worth it.
   Its not like we wont die anyway, what are we waiting for? We have the will.
   Consider our lives. How much of it has been wasted carrying the dead weight of timid fear and greedy comfort? What good has it done us?
   The purpose of life isn't to escape struggle and death its to burn with will untill the end.

   Ordeal, suffering, struggle, will, life. 

This is the truth and the way and to die easy is to blaspheme against life.

-

                                                       

"I don't mind paying the price but, by God, I demand the price be worth paying!"

            James mason, Siege, 2.23.

-

"He is not fit for battle, who has never experienced humiliation. He who has seen his blood flow, has heard his teeth crunch in combat, has stumbled under the full weight of his enemy . . . and often fallen, learns to rise up more stubbornly, and joins a fight with great confidence."

            Roger of Hoveden.

To be clear, I'm not some great paragon of limitless will. I'm not a 'great soul' or even very impressive. No one will ever make a statue to me. I will never be celebrated or remembered. When i die it will be as if i never was. I write this to remind myself as much as share these thoughts with you in the hope that it will have some good effect on us all. Don't die easy.

Freedom

A used up wrinkly old disease riddled slut, dressed like a whore with its makeup running, needle marks in its arms and kebab grease down its front. Stinking of drink and slurring its speech as it tries to convince everyone its the attractive 19 year old it used to be so long ago that no one remembers. Being held hostage by a morbidly obese lunatic on a mobility scooter with a rainbow dildo up its ass. Crying, unkempt beard, reeking of smeg, naked but for a cut off 't' shirt that's stretched to tearing point with "boi toi"  written on it in crayon. Shoving shit into its mouth with one hand while holding the old slut at gunpoint because "Its mommy!" and it knows that its the only thing that stands between it and extermination. Placing all its hope on the assumption that we care more about the life of a cum dumpster than sanity.

Permissiveness and liberalism

The underlying motivations of liberalism are not inherently wrong. Compassion, empathy and the inclination to respect peoples personal choice is quite decent and the urge to create a society that reflects this has a sort of nobility to it.
   These simple drives can function fairly well in a more basic setting in which Natural Law imposes itself directly on us because they are limited by circumstances. The daily struggle for survival that Natural Law demands teaches us the importance of nation, the value of family and the ability to work and sacrifice for something greater than ourselves. We learn that violence is natural and what can happen when we loose. The more extreme degenerates would typically get weeded out either by the community or by their own inability to function. The basic drives that liberalism depends on are tempered by these realities, they are kept in proportion.
   Our basic drives evolved to fit an ecology governed by Natural Law that balanced them and curbed their excesses allowing us to function in a natural and fundamentally healthy way in spite of, or because of, the struggles involved. But we no longer live in an ecology governed directly by Natural Law. Through our cleverness we have developed ways to mitigate or avoid some of the limitations and struggles that are our birthright and we have combined this with super-abundance and hyper-stimulation. The result is grossly exaggerated instinctual drives with little immediate limiting factors in the short term:
   Grotesque parodies of compassion, empathy and self hate masquerading as morality.
   Obesity and physical weakness resulting from idleness and profligacy.
  Sexual perversion of every sort via pornography and promiscuity enabled by mass media, medicine and the deliberate destruction of the family and its function.
   Ignorance, selfishness, cowardice and arrogance in the guise of individualism.
   Mothers proudly murdering their own children in the womb and calling it their choice.
   The underlying motivations that gives rise to liberalism and permissiveness can exist within a hard setting because their excesses are curbed by reality. But they cease to function properly when placed in a softer and superficially more lenient setting.
   Liberalism and permissiveness fail because they have no internal coherence or structure allowing them to function without the direct imposition of Natural Law.  Like an amputated limb they are an impulse without a setting.
   Liberalist of one type or another will bleat their insipid "don't tread on me's!" and "Golden Rule's" as long as the boot of uncompromising Natural Law, the structure of reality itself, is held off their necks by better men than themselves. But in a world where the Fox MUST kill to survive and the Rabbit MUST run to live a little longer the 'golden Rule' is absurd, delusional and doomed.
   What could be more ridiculous than liberalism in a world of violent struggle and hard reality? What imbecile or madman could belive it? I did and i find that fact shame full and barely comprehensible now.
There are two solutions to the problem of instinct in the absence of immediately applied Natural Law:

   1. The 'Amish' Solution: Regress our technology to the point where Natural Law can more directly and immediately impose itself on us so that our drives assume their normal roles once more in the absence of hyper stimulation, super abundance and ease. Liberal drives revert to a simple respect for personal boundaries and common decency within a cohesive community that is bound together by need, shared values and race. This is effectively a lobotomy, it requires that we deny the full scope of what it means to be at least a semi-sentient part of existence. It means to deliberately learn nothing. It means growing potatoes instead of exploring the universe.

   2. The Will Solution: Act with discipline and a practical understanding of Natural Law to deliberately curb our excesses. To act in accordance with Natural Law as an act of will and choice not just because we are powerless to do anything else. To recognise that Natural Law isn't just the basic structure of reality but that its structure IS virtue and to live by it is the only true morality. This allows us to view life honestly and go to the stars as a whole, sane people.

It means to live and build our nations based on these truths:
   The morality of sentiment (liberalism) is the morality of a victim.
   The morality of might is the morality of a rapist.
   The morality of strength is the morality of nature. Anything less is betrayal, delusion and death.
   Every civilisation that progresses far enough encounters the problem of what to do when let of the leash of Natural Law for a time. Every civilisation that has proceeded us so far has failed this test and died one way or another.
   Will we be the first to pass the test and become an embodiment of Natural Law instead of just a glorified ape on its way to extinction?
   Liberalism and permissiveness were doomed from the start but without experiencing their siren call and seeing the horrific results how would we know?

"Liberalism is moral syphilis" J.Bowden.

Hatred and Weakness

There are non whites that make us hate them and there are non whites that make us weak.
The ones that make us weak are by far the more dangerous, thay make us collaborate with our own death.

In this picture the child is the most lethal

A hard truth

Statement: Don't tread on me.

Reply: There is in all life theft and murder.

What they taught me

   All my life i have been told that we are moulded by society into what we become. When non whites behave the way they do it is because of the social conditions we have imposed upon them. I was told that these non whites needed good role models, more money, more representation and so on. That without them they would naturally 'go bad' because we have oppressed them.
   These same believers in the 'blank slate'  then proceed to routinely portray my people as stupid, fat, lazy, entitled and every other type of degenerate possible. Our women are taught to be grotesque and our men are taught to join in. Everything we are is denigrated and slandered. They portray sodomy and every perversion as normal and lampshade our history to make us think it was always that way. They coerce us into stepping aside for their special interest groups at the expense of our own people.
   When you realise that the people controlling our media seem to actually believe their blank slate nonsense their actual motivation becomes horribly clear.
They want to drag us down.
They want us dead.
This is what they have taught me about themselves.

Koan

Q: What is the difference between a domesticated animal and a wild one?
A: Struggle

A Tale of Control

A group or white men are standing about talking.
   Some distance away but within earshot are a group of jews.
   The jews are mostly ignoring the white men when they aren't trying to scam them or wipe them out.
Suddenly the jews stiffen in shock, they just heard some of the white men say "Jew!" and then "Fucking Kikes!" one of them even said "its our country!"
Looking over they see some of the white men are glancing in their direction with anger.
   They return to their huddle with a new intensity. After a little while one of their number comes forth and stands a little way from its tribe. Unfurling a flag bearing a swastika the jew proceeds to shout "Kike! Yid! Heeb!" and so on. Some of the white men walk over to watch more closely. The jew begins to hop from foot to foot, waving its arms and doing a little dance all the while shouting the same simplistic slogans and shallow parodies in mockery of the flag he stands beneath.
   The white men watching beckon more of their people over and the jew puts his hat down on the ground so they can put shekels in it "for the movement", all the while studiously avoiding mention of any real knowledge or productive action. The crowd begins to dance like the jew.
After some time another white man joins them and begins pointing all this out to the crowd.
   Most just put their fingers in their ears and carry on dancing, others ask "what have YOU done for the movement?!", some will accuse him of being a jew. Even when the man gives proof of the jews actions they just say "hes a good one, stop purity spiralling. Its people like you that are the problem!"
   But the actual jew isn't worried, he just points and laughs at the stupid goyim and swindles more shekels. Slowly the jew dance changes, instead of a simple parody in mockery of the swastika the jew begins to add new elements till eventually and without realising it the white men are dancing almost independently of the jew, almost. The jew is delighted, it has learnt a new way of manipulating the goyim while hiding in plain sight, gets to make more shekels and the foolish goyim actively defend it.

  

Perverted altruism

"White people are evil, they owe us! Apologise! Reparations! Privilege! Imperialist! Racist!" and on and on . . .
The fundamental dishonesty is sickening. If we really where so bad such name calling would mean little to us. Why would it? Why would we care? But we do care and its because we aren't really what they claim. Its not that we haven't done 'bad' things its that even at our worst we are actually quite nice, this is easily demonstrated by simple honest comparison with our accusers. We want to be decent and so we are susceptible to this sort of moral/emotional blackmail. It can only work on generally decent people and they know we are decent because if they didn't they would be afraid, yet they clearly are not. This is the perversion, to take something decent in our people and turn it into a weapon to extort and exterminate us.
   For our people to live we must burn away all compassion and empathy for each and every non white without exception.
   Sentiment or survival.

Compromise and consensus

   People think that a strong, cohesive group is made through dialogue and compromise.
It is not.
   When 'A' wont compromise and 'B' will then 'A' is the ruler.
   'A' controls the terms.
   'A' directs the narrative.
   'B' just has to go along with it, regardless of any feeble objections.
   'B' can fuck off by themselves if they want but if they are the type to compromise they will be unlikely to do that for long especially if 'A' gets results.
   Most people are 'B'.
   If you try to debate your way to consensus you will get a 'manifesto' in 403 pages with a series of foot notes longer than the original document that means precisely nothing and only serves to piss everyone off.
   We don't need to dot every 'i', we just need to get the basic principles understood by most. If they want to learn more then great but it is not required.
   If you are considering compromise it can never be on anything meaningful and it must ALWAYS be reciprocated.
   If we compromise in order to get people to listen to us (i.e broaden the appeal) we are lying to ourselves and them. Speak honestly and fully, without compromise and trust them to understand, if your message is correct and they can see its truth in their own lives they will.
   This doesn't deal with the outright lies of the enemy and de-platforming, but if we don't proceed from the above basis we are doing their work for them.

Never compromise.

E-Celebs

I have often felt dubious of the various e-celebrities that claim to be National Socialists or something similar. This was partly because i was unsure what national socialism really was and partly because of the behaviour of these people.
   I would set aside my doubts as unfounded and told myself i still had much to learn. I ignored the warnings of my inner voice and dismissed the accusations others made as simple noise or misinformation.
   I can no longer do this.
   I have developed a level of knowledge and awareness that matches my inner voice and tells me the truth. These people are charlatans. They are every bit merchants of the same filth as always with a different wrapping.
So what to do when those i believed in turn out to be worthless?
I have realised that in looking for a leader i relinquished my own will and agency, such as it is.
I became a useful idiot and for what? To mitigate my own weakness.
While it is certain i will make mistakes again i will never make this mistake again.
When everything else is gone i have my own self to rely on.
Guided by healthy cynicism and suspicion i will evaluate them based on their character and actions, not words.
If they want my trust and support they must earn it.
Though my knowledge is far from complete i will trust what i have; my self and my own judgement even though it will sometimes be wrong.
Credulity is the host of lies.

Lays of Aincient Rome

To every man upon this earth

Death cometh soon or late.

And how can man die better

Than facing fearful odds,

For the ashes of his fathers,

And the temples of his gods

     

                        Horatius, xxvii. 

                    Thomas Babington Macaulay

Longing

It seems that he could no more find content in those places, but had formed a mighty longing for the English cliffs and downlands of his boyhood; where in little dreaming villages England’s old songs hover at evening behind lattice windows, and where grey church towers peep lovely through the verdure of distant valleys. He could not go back to these things in the waking world because his body was dead; but he had done the next best thing and dreamed a small tract of such countryside in the region east of the city, where meadows roll gracefully up from the sea-cliffs to the foot of the Tanarian Hills. There he dwelt in a grey Gothic manor-house of stone looking on the sea, and tried to think it was ancient Trevor Towers, where he was born and where thirteen generations of his forefathers had first seen the light. And on the coast nearby he had built a little Cornish fishing village with steep cobbled ways, settling therein such people as had the most English faces, and seeking ever to teach them the dear remembered accents of old Cornwall fishers. And in a valley not far off he had reared a great Norman Abbey whose tower he could see from his window, placing around it in the churchyard grey stones with the names of his ancestors carved thereon, and with a moss somewhat like Old England’s moss. For though Kuranes was a monarch in the land of dream, with all imagined pomps and marvels, splendours and beauties, ecstacies and delights, novelties and excitements at his command, he would gladly have resigned forever the whole of his power and luxury and freedom for one blessed day as a simple boy in that pure and quiet England, that ancient, beloved England which had moulded his being and of which he must always be immutably a part.

                                                                        H.P Lovecraft, 1927.
                                                                     The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath

#notall . . .

#notallmuslims
#notalljews
#notallblacks
Why do people say this?
It has the semblance of reason and is factually accurate. But their is a lot more to it than that.
It means that if any of the people that are murdering us isnt an active participant then we cant do anything. Just in case.
Because we cant risk feeling bad now can we?
We must paralyse ourselves with timid, weak morality, choose our pathetic conscience over our people and slip closer to extinction.
Isnt it only the moral thing to do?
When even those who claim to fight for our people are infected with sentiment it can only end one way.
We are dying of sentiment.
If we are to survive it will be without sentiment.
Because our survival as a people cannot be accomplished without the most ruthless of actions.
I dont care if its 'not all . . . '
I dont care if its 'unjust'
I dont care if its horrific.
And if you do care you should join the other preening cunts with their 'refugees welcome signs' and excuses.

If all sentiment for non whites was removed from you what would you do and why?
-
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

Merit > Equality

The sacred cow of equality has three manifestations:
1.Equality of ability
2.Equality of opportunity
3.Equality of outcome

   Equality of ability: This is clearly and self evidently absurd. We are not equal, our personal talents, abilities and our very natures are in no way equal. Their is no equality of ability and it doesn't matter how that inequality of ability came to be. From a practical point of view it only matters that it exists.
   Equality of opportunity: This is lunacy especially in light of the first. How can you give 'equal opportunity' to a genius and a retard? To a man without eyes and a man without legs? Accurate, objective evaluation of the relative merit of the people involved is correct and necessary but how does this equate with equality? In fact objectivity can only result in inequality because we are inherently unequal.
   Equality of outcome: If their is no equality of our natures and no equality of opportunity why would we expect equality of outcome? On the contrary, honest objectivity expects to see inequality of outcome.

   They begin with the incorrect assumption that the fictional concept of equality is real and through lack of personal honesty and self awareness they make it a sacred cow. Everything must bend or break before this bloated, sacred dishonesty. If their is inequality it cannot be a result of inherent differences or merit but only because of external factors, oppression, unfairness or injustice. Like a bad scientist they look for the results they crave and when they are absent they will make observable reality conform to their theory. But reality wont bend or break for them and as time passes and inequality only becomes more apparent they become more desperate: Preferential treatment for their pets, wild accusations of nebulous, unspecified 'institutionalised' or society wide oppression, shrill aggression.
   But inequality is natural law.
   It is as non negotiable as gravity.
   Equality is the antithesis of merit because meritocracy is inherently unequal and elitist.
   It is because honest merit is objective that it is unequal, elitist and it works.
   Equality cannot exist, and the reality of pursuing this perverse fiction is becoming hideously self evident to anyone with basic honesty.
   Equality is a weapon they use to convince us that what is happening is correct and good when infact it is incorrect and evil.

...and cannot come again

          XL (40)

          Into my heart an air that kills
           From yon far country blows:
          What are those blue remembered hills,
           What spires, what farms are those?

          That is the land of lost content,
           I see it shining plain,
          The happy highways where I went
           And cannot come again.

                       Alfred Edward Housman, A shropshire Lad.

The truth and the way

All life is a product of will; Will to survive, will to procreate, will to fight, will to sacrifice, will to power.
 Where will is lacking life is lacking.
Just as all life arises and continues through will, all power to act in life is a manifestation of Will.
All power and the will that creates it must eventually be expressed as physical violence when it encounters sufficient resistance.
 This is observable and irrefutable.
 Violence is natural law.
Honest violence is the ultimate expression of life/will/power and only the violent can honestly act.
 The merchant must buy violence.
 The weak must appeal to sentiment.
 Lacking direct violence of their own the merchant, the pathetic, the seductive and the soft will always try to subvert the violent for their own convenience like a parasite that rewrites the brain of its host.
  Only the violent can honestly act but remember, healthy violence is a tool not a master and without a purpose it becomes degenerate.
 Violence contains no morality, it isn't right or wrong and carries no judgement. Violence is simply the fundamental mechanism that governs all life.
 Violence must be guided by will in accordance with natural law in the name of our people.
This is the truth and the way:
        Oh my brothers, the Universe belongs to violence and the violent will always rule it.
-

"It is not bad, it is high time,

Stark violence is still the sire of all the world’s values"

The Bloody Sire, Robinson Jeffers

Family

In amongst all the hatred, disgust and vengeance it is easy to forget what we are fighting for.
This is especially true of young men.
   We aren't fighting to establish tyranny, freedom, an economy or a political system.
   We are not merely fighting for survival on a superficial level or even on a personal one.
   This is as much a spiritual battle against weakness and degradation as a physical one against extinction.
   We are fighting for our family. Our men and women of all ages who have ever lived or will ever live, all functioning as a natural organic whole; our nation. We are fighting to transform our family into one that can live a natural life free from degeneracy both within and without.
   Living in accordance with logos not because it imposes itself upon us but by an act of will, to choose natural law because it is right and true.
   Neither rebelling against nature or victim of it.
   Animated by will, unified by love and duty, guided by natural law and the fierce morality of strength.
   Healthy, vigorous, hard, strong.